AllStarInvestor.com
Home | Trial Subscription | Contact Us | About Us | Tell a Friend | Search | SUBSCRIBER LOGIN


 Investing Strategies
Updates
Open Positions
ETF Strategy
Fidelity Single Sector
Fidelity Multi-Sector
Rydex Strategy
Equity Trader (Stocks)
 ETF Rankings
Sector ETFs
International ETFs
Style ETFs
Bond ETFs
Leveraged & Inverse
Commodity ETFs
Currency ETFs
IPOs (New ETFs)
Do Not Trade ETFs
 Fund Rankings
Fidelity Select
Fidelity Non-Select
FSS Rankings
Tradable Long
Tradable Lev'd & Inv
Index Benchmarks
 The Basics
Build Your Portfolio
Downloads
Ranking Categories
Tickers with Category
 Help
Our Guarantee
Our Privacy Policy
Our Terms of Use
About Us
 


Friday, Oct 17, 2008
Is the Sage of Omaha Infallible?
By Patrick Watson

3:15pm Central Time

Stock investors were slightly encouraged today by a New York Times guest column by the greatest of all investors, Warren Buffett.  He says he is buying U.S. stocks in his personal account because they are now so undervalued.  It's classic Buffett action: "A simple rule dictates my buying: Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful."

This is clearly good advice, and anyone who has followed Buffett's style should not be surprised to learn he is buying now.  On the other hand, Buffett was also buying a few weeks ago when Berkshire Hathaway made large purchases of preferred stock from Goldman Sachs (GS) and General Electric (GE). Both those investments are now deeply underwater, though Buffett negotiated very attractive dividends that give him plenty of income while he waits.  He even admits "I can't predict the short-term movements of the stock market" in the NYT column.

Yet this smells odd to me.  Buffett is no dummy, and he didn't become the richest man in the world by telegraphing his plans on the pages of the national newspaper of record.  Also strange is a little tidbit from this early-morning CNBC report.  Becky Quick says Buffett told them that he was buying yesterday morning while the benchmarks were down, but stopped when the Dow turned up by 400 points.  That doesn't fit.  Buffett says he doesn't know what the short-term movements mean.  If he is really so bullish, why let 400 points stand in his way?

My guess -- and I have absolutely no evidence for this -- is that Buffett was probably asked to write this column by people who want to change investor sentiment.  Who would that be?  The prime suspect is Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, though I wouldn't be surprised if the request came from President Bush himself.  They know how much influence Buffett has on small investors.  Being a patriotic citizen, Buffett would probably do as they asked.  It wouldn't hurt if he could help his own book in the process.

If this is what happened, it's not good news for the markets.  It means that the Bush Administration is still flailing around, trying to find something that will help reverse this downturn.  Furthermore, even Buffett's influence seems not to have been enough, with the markets ending the day down again.  Better luck next week?  I sure hope so.

Permalink

Thursday, Oct 16, 2008
The Culture of Entitlement Has Limits
By Brandon Clay

4:33 pm Central Time

It's no secret the culture of entitlement is alive and well on Wall Street. Expectations for financial backstops are rampant in banks. No matter what sort of bad derivatives, bad loans and just plain bad decisions were made in these institutions, these financial companies still expect a bailout. The thinking goes: If the proletariat gets the doll, then why can't the bourgeoisie get the same attention? Such is the mindset on the Street.

But I Earned My Bonus!

Banks are not just giant skyscrapers with neon logos. They're real businesses run by real people with an agenda. C-Suite executives in Lower Manhattan are indoctrinated with the entitlement-mindset at an early point in their careers. These bankers graduated from top-tier business schools. They slaved their way through phone books at the wirehouses. They schmoozed better than any of their peers, and finally rose to the top of their firms. They earned their paneled offices and corresponding exorbitant bonuses -- or so goes the feeling. 

According to the Washington Post, in 2007 Wall Street firms paid out $33.2 billion in bonuses down only 2% from 2006. This is on top of nearly $90 billion dollars in other compensation. Bear in mind, these bonuses were paid when net revenue fell by 6% for the top 7 firms. Total compensation accounted for 47% of the total revenue.

Despite crumbling foundations in the market, broken derivatives they helped create, and diminished shareholder value, firms still shelled out billions to compensate their workforce. Never mind that Mr. and Mrs. Jones just lost 10% of their net worth -- those guys need the 08 Maserati.  After all, they run banks not charities.

Forgone Bonus: A Hopeful Sign?

As perplexing (and depressing) as this situation is, I found a hopeful sign today. A shimmering counterexample in the culture of entitlement happens to be in Europe. Leave it to German bankers to show more humility than their American counterparts.

According to Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank CEO Josef Ackerman declined his bonus this year in favor of more 'deserving colleagues'. Don't ask me where the bank was going manufacture bonus money. Wasn't it Deutsche Bank that just received a cash infusion from the European Central Bank 2 days ago?...but I digress.

Perhaps other executives will follow Ackerman's lead. Maybe firms will enforce a no-bonus policy until the current crisis has passed. After all, it's not like some of these companies would even be around without Uncle Sam's help. Couldn't they hold off on that Central Park apartment purchase and multi-million dollar bonus check until the credit storm is over?

Don't count on it.

Permalink
Tuesday, Oct 14, 2008
A Better But Still Painful Way
By Patrick Watson

3:06 pm Central Time

Financial super-blogger Mish Shedlock has been following the various bank rescue/bailout plans with a jaundiced eye.  On Monday he summarized it more succinctly than anyone else I have seen so far:

"To stimulate lending, the bailout plan will attempt to recapitalize banks. The method of recapitalization is best described as robbing Taxpayer Pete to pay Wall Street Paul. In essence, money is taken from the poor (via taxes, printing, and weakening of the dollar) and given to the wealthy so the wealthy supposedly will have enough money to lend back (at interest) to those who have just been robbed."

This is disturbingly accurate.  (Here is a similar illustration in cartoon form.)  The government is now engaged in a massive transfer of wealth, all in the name of saving the financial system.  Today the Treasury revealed it will be taking equity stakes in thousands of banks in an effort to give them more working capital.  The nationalization of American finance is proceeding quickly.

The better plan, in my view, is this: Let Them Fail.  Banks that cannot survive without help from the taxpayers should be allowed to collapse in an orderly way.  Give the money we are now spending on bailouts to FDIC so it can pay off the depositors of fallen banks, who will then move their money to stronger institutions.

What about shareholders and bondholders of the foolish banks?  They'll be wiped out.  Too bad, since this will hurt a lot of innocent people with unwitting exposure to banks through index funds and pension plans.  The sad truth is they are being hurt anyway by being forced to finance the bailouts.  Do it my way, and at least the guilty will be punished.  Executives who want their golden parachutes can line up in bankruptcy court with everyone else.

Capitalism has been compared to Darwinism -- survival of the fittest.  When push comes to shove, however, it seems the bold and the brave are actually neither.  They are getting off far easier than they deserve.

Permalink
Monday, Oct 13, 2008
A Big Day - But Hold the Applause
By Brandon Clay

4:39 pm Central Time

It was a big day for the market. The Dow had the biggest one day point gain in history, jumping over 936 points. The S&P 500 was up over a 1000 again and the Nasdaq had the biggest percentage gain by rising +11.8%. If you watch CNBC, you knew something was different by all the smiling hosts.

It started this morning across the pond when the British government gave three banks £37 billion ($64 billion) according to Bloomberg. In addition, EU nations plan to provide over €1.3 trillion ($1.8 trillion) in loan guarantees and capital to European banks. It's sometimes hard to see what changes the investor sentiment, but it looks like this was the reason for buying today.

Earnings May Affect Gains

Not to throw cold water on the day's events, but here's a few facts to consider. Earnings season is upon us. Many companies are on tap over the next few weeks including 3M (MMM), American Express (AXP), Apple (AAPL), and Yahoo (YHO). Third quarter earnings and guidance for the next quarter is sure to send shockwaves throughout the market. VIX levels remain high with volatility being the rule rather than the exception. Ironically, if anything can be counted on, it's more uncertainty.

Bill Gates and Jeff Immelt Do Not Call 'All Clear'

There are other signs for concern as well. Microsoft co-founder, Bill Gates, is bearish on the economy, if not the whole market. In remarks to Harvard Business School, he said he foresees a "fairly significant recession". Moreover, he sees unemployment peaking at more than 9%. Not a very rosy picture.

Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric (GE), had similar feelings. He's now confident the U.S. economy will see two quarters of negative growth commenting that the latest market action has been "unspeakable, undreamed-of, and really, really tough."

If Immelt is right, and the U.S. economy sees 6 months of recession, that's not too bad. The market typically looks ahead two quarters and prices future economic realities today. But if Immelt is wrong and recession lasts longer than he expects, we are in for more pain. At this point, even the most optimistic observers have been wrong -- it's not hard to imagine more "undreamed-of" realities occurring in the next few weeks.

Cash is still attractive. We may look back at this day as a great chance to jump out. Then again, it could be the start of another rally -- doubtful, but possible. Unfortunately, none of us have the benefit of a time machine.

Permalink

 

DISCLAIMER: This is not investment, trading, tax, or legal advice. All opinion in this blog is intended for informational purpose only. Nothing provided in this blog constitutes a recommendation or solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities. Blog authors sometimes hold positions in the securities mentioned. Invest at your own risk. Blog authors not liable for any losses incurred in your portfolio.